Walleye | Review: Girl with the Dragon Tattoo
Let's play a minute in this passage at the beginning of the movie where the boss explains the plot, and I will tell you things you already know: As you know, "Girl with a Dragon Tattoo" is a book that sold the most copies in recent years that does not include bespectacled wizards or vampires ulay sparkle, and is have been working for a Swedish film'd done well. The book into a movie, it is likely that many of the viewers' Tattoo, a Swedish accent American version "already experienced the story in this version or another and know how and where it is going. So not just me - I have not read the book, but I saw the previous film - but most viewers make it - read - the - book, and most of us will be hard to stop comparing his previous film versions.
First the easy part: When it comes to movies, "girl" American ripping the "girl" Swedish pieces. Well, no forces. Meaning of Fincher directing, Trent Rnzor the soundtrack and Hollywood budget is the opening credits alone (think ulay of the opening song James Bond movie. ulay Now think about it again, on drugs, with chrome plating, and dual speed " The Immigrant ulay Song "in the background) are worth watching more than the entire ulay Swedish film. Every frame in the film is designed, meticulously polished and accompanying soundtrack is not exactly music but noise is well composed. Even players much better, or at least, the only actress considered: I never understood why people were excited Nomi Reppas role of Lisbeth Sandler Swedish version, which is seen as just a girl with a Gothic pose. Rooney Mara, however, ulay extreme, bizarre, strong and much more unexpected. It looks like the autistic version of Justin Bieber at certain moments, and Amazon cyberpunk moment later. If the choice is between the two films, the answer is obvious: Do not be a Swede.
But all this does not make the movie a success especially Finz'riim standards. Issues which he deals - homicide from the past, an outbreak of violence, gruesome, ulay cold and alienation ulay - are such that Fincher could direct his eyes closed, and in fact, I'm not sure that both his eyes were open as directing this film. It is made in a totally professional, he looks and sounds good, and yet it feels like a hollow film. That comes and goes. Where is it and where "seven sins".
The problem ulay is the source. The book, that is. Book fans will have to forgive me, but is not a good story. Investigative journalist Michael Blomkwist called the island north of Sweden, where family life is rich and corrupt, to try to unravel the murder happened forty years ago. Meanwhile, Lisbeth Salander, a young mite with a shady past and questionable mental stability even more, trying to live her life the dark and pierced ulay despite the opposition of her nasty probation officer. For half a movie there is no connection between these two stories, and Hzigzogym Among them are completely random, ulay as if Fincher slumped in front of the television and flicked through the channels between the two programs, ulay none of which is not terribly interested. Even after Slisbt and Michael finally meet and their stories come together for a while, Zap continues after the main mystery is solved - what most of the films was the precursor to the public can start to wear coats that immediately come to the credits - the film continues, ulay for some reason, another twenty m missing narrative justification, as if someone forgot to turn off the camera when the story ends.
It was all just like that, I promise, even in the book. But why do I care what was in the book? Respect to the source is important, but adaptations of books are afraid to deviate from the right or left plot for fear of fans are starting to get on my nerves. While the film makes a few changes in representative plot - there is one rather large toward the end - but do not have much meaning, and they do not affect the pace of the film problematic. The plot of the book does not have the structure of a film, at least not a successful movie, and the thing to do was to change it. Rewrite it from scratch, if necessary. My part could throw Michael Blomkwist away completely, that is not terribly interesting, and after all, there is a reason that a movie is not called "man with blue eyes." Blomkwist part of the plot is nothing more than a spy story, not bad, but the standard . No one watching the film - Swedish, American, whatever - will argue with the fact that the strong ulay element, and more like it will not involve ulay the Blomkwist any way: it is the ... meeting of Lisbeth with her probation officer, and what happens to him. This fascinating and horrifying scene that can make viewers biting lips, close your eyes, Largf hands and thus do not dare miss a second - just like Fincher's film should be. But it comes fairly early in the film, and what happens then is anticlimax.
I have not read the book and seen the Swedish film, but the book I heard a lot of praise. I love Daniel Craig, the trailer looks good (except the very long version of his. 8 minutes, really?) Fincher's name goes before him. But after this review ulay it sounds like just another movie pass for two and a half fun then forget him (although I understand it is very dark and gloomy).
I do not agree with the criticism that me To finally felt that everything was related and connected and waited expectantly has been that the two protagonists meet me, it added additional stress Mikael (it was translated Laibrit says so) does not even redundant, two characters complement each other without Lisbeth is would sit and he would come to nothing and Llisbt was not reason that motivates her to do things she does and fighting for him was a moment in people came already cheering ulay applause when she came to rescue him, in general are all very much enjoyed the story between them and we wanted it to develop novel (not the messages ulay as educational ulay of course lol reminds the Twilight section of an older man with a young woman) was not a moment will get bored except Finally it started to become too emotional, but sent a message and really felt sorry for that moment on Lisbeth that throughout the film turn towards physical violence and now hurt her emotionally from a human it started late Sue
Let's play a minute in this passage at the beginning of the movie where the boss explains the plot, and I will tell you things you already know: As you know, "Girl with a Dragon Tattoo" is a book that sold the most copies in recent years that does not include bespectacled wizards or vampires ulay sparkle, and is have been working for a Swedish film'd done well. The book into a movie, it is likely that many of the viewers' Tattoo, a Swedish accent American version "already experienced the story in this version or another and know how and where it is going. So not just me - I have not read the book, but I saw the previous film - but most viewers make it - read - the - book, and most of us will be hard to stop comparing his previous film versions.
First the easy part: When it comes to movies, "girl" American ripping the "girl" Swedish pieces. Well, no forces. Meaning of Fincher directing, Trent Rnzor the soundtrack and Hollywood budget is the opening credits alone (think ulay of the opening song James Bond movie. ulay Now think about it again, on drugs, with chrome plating, and dual speed " The Immigrant ulay Song "in the background) are worth watching more than the entire ulay Swedish film. Every frame in the film is designed, meticulously polished and accompanying soundtrack is not exactly music but noise is well composed. Even players much better, or at least, the only actress considered: I never understood why people were excited Nomi Reppas role of Lisbeth Sandler Swedish version, which is seen as just a girl with a Gothic pose. Rooney Mara, however, ulay extreme, bizarre, strong and much more unexpected. It looks like the autistic version of Justin Bieber at certain moments, and Amazon cyberpunk moment later. If the choice is between the two films, the answer is obvious: Do not be a Swede.
But all this does not make the movie a success especially Finz'riim standards. Issues which he deals - homicide from the past, an outbreak of violence, gruesome, ulay cold and alienation ulay - are such that Fincher could direct his eyes closed, and in fact, I'm not sure that both his eyes were open as directing this film. It is made in a totally professional, he looks and sounds good, and yet it feels like a hollow film. That comes and goes. Where is it and where "seven sins".
The problem ulay is the source. The book, that is. Book fans will have to forgive me, but is not a good story. Investigative journalist Michael Blomkwist called the island north of Sweden, where family life is rich and corrupt, to try to unravel the murder happened forty years ago. Meanwhile, Lisbeth Salander, a young mite with a shady past and questionable mental stability even more, trying to live her life the dark and pierced ulay despite the opposition of her nasty probation officer. For half a movie there is no connection between these two stories, and Hzigzogym Among them are completely random, ulay as if Fincher slumped in front of the television and flicked through the channels between the two programs, ulay none of which is not terribly interested. Even after Slisbt and Michael finally meet and their stories come together for a while, Zap continues after the main mystery is solved - what most of the films was the precursor to the public can start to wear coats that immediately come to the credits - the film continues, ulay for some reason, another twenty m missing narrative justification, as if someone forgot to turn off the camera when the story ends.
It was all just like that, I promise, even in the book. But why do I care what was in the book? Respect to the source is important, but adaptations of books are afraid to deviate from the right or left plot for fear of fans are starting to get on my nerves. While the film makes a few changes in representative plot - there is one rather large toward the end - but do not have much meaning, and they do not affect the pace of the film problematic. The plot of the book does not have the structure of a film, at least not a successful movie, and the thing to do was to change it. Rewrite it from scratch, if necessary. My part could throw Michael Blomkwist away completely, that is not terribly interesting, and after all, there is a reason that a movie is not called "man with blue eyes." Blomkwist part of the plot is nothing more than a spy story, not bad, but the standard . No one watching the film - Swedish, American, whatever - will argue with the fact that the strong ulay element, and more like it will not involve ulay the Blomkwist any way: it is the ... meeting of Lisbeth with her probation officer, and what happens to him. This fascinating and horrifying scene that can make viewers biting lips, close your eyes, Largf hands and thus do not dare miss a second - just like Fincher's film should be. But it comes fairly early in the film, and what happens then is anticlimax.
I have not read the book and seen the Swedish film, but the book I heard a lot of praise. I love Daniel Craig, the trailer looks good (except the very long version of his. 8 minutes, really?) Fincher's name goes before him. But after this review ulay it sounds like just another movie pass for two and a half fun then forget him (although I understand it is very dark and gloomy).
I do not agree with the criticism that me To finally felt that everything was related and connected and waited expectantly has been that the two protagonists meet me, it added additional stress Mikael (it was translated Laibrit says so) does not even redundant, two characters complement each other without Lisbeth is would sit and he would come to nothing and Llisbt was not reason that motivates her to do things she does and fighting for him was a moment in people came already cheering ulay applause when she came to rescue him, in general are all very much enjoyed the story between them and we wanted it to develop novel (not the messages ulay as educational ulay of course lol reminds the Twilight section of an older man with a young woman) was not a moment will get bored except Finally it started to become too emotional, but sent a message and really felt sorry for that moment on Lisbeth that throughout the film turn towards physical violence and now hurt her emotionally from a human it started late Sue
No comments:
Post a Comment